Eight Palestine Action activists on hunger strike while in prison awaiting trial are dying, according to a doctor. PA Media says:

Dr James Smith, a qualified emergency physician who is a lecturer at University College London, told a press conference the group, who are accused of break-ins or criminal damage on behalf of Palestine Action, need specialist medical help.

His warning comes amid calls for the government to intervene from doctors and politicians, including former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who claimed there have been “regular breaches of prison conditions and prison rules”.

Some of the eight prisoners, who began the action in protest at being held in custody while awaiting trial, have been taken to hospital.

Former industrial and mining communities across Britain are facing “entrenched disadvantage” stretching back some 50 years, the latest research on social mobility has found. PA Media reports:

So-called left-behind communities in Yorkshire, the north-east, the Midlands, Wales and Scotland which were rapidly de-industrialised throughout the late 20th century are still disadvantaged and facing decline after decades in the same condition, the Social Mobility Commission (SMC) warned.

The commission’s latest State Of The Nation report highlights stark differences in social mobility across the regions and nations of the UK.

Some Britons face fewer job opportunities, a lack of growth and a worse childhood as a result of where they live.

The SMC also warned about the class disparities in the number of young people who are not in education, employment or training (Neets), a group which has grown in recent years.

More than double of the number of young people from working-class backgrounds are Neets (22%) than from professional backgrounds (9%), the SMC said.

The commission did acknowledge there was growth in the percentage of younger people getting good jobs, with 48.2% of 25-29 year olds in professional careers as of 2022-2024, compared with 36.1% in 2014-2016.

However, it also warned of a widening gap between those from privileged and working-class backgrounds who were getting into these jobs.

Women from less well-off backgrounds also continue to experience more difficulty with getting higher-paid jobs than more privileged women, the commission said.

The full report is here. This year’s report contains more international comparison data than in the past, and this chart summarises the main findings.

The company linked to the former Conservative peer Michelle Mone, which owes the government almost £150m for supplying unusable personal protective equipment during the pandemic, has been put into liquidation, David Conn reports.

The opening of the long-awaited Leeds tram system has been pushed back by at least two to three years, after a government review of the £2.5bn project, Gwyn Topham reports.

Kemi Badenoch has dismissed the government’s VAWG strategy as a “complete distraction”, arguing that teaching boys to respect women should not be a priority because migrants post a more serious threat.

In a post on social media, and comments quoted by the Telegraph, she backed up the arguments used by Katie Lam in the Commons (see 2.29pm) – but went further, dismissing the long-awaited policy document as “just a big mess”.

Badenoch said:

It’s not 11-year-old boys who are committing violence against women and girls.

We need to get people who have come from cultures that don’t respect women out of our country! Not all cultures are equally valid.

Labour’s plan to lecture schoolboys to respect women and girls is a complete distraction. This is what a government looks like when they’re completely out of ideas.

Deport all foreign criminals. Put more police on our streets. Conservatives have a funded plan to recruit 10,000 extra officers.

Pretending a few extra lessons in school will fix this is complete nonsense. Labour need to stop watching Adolesence and get real.

But they can’t, because they’re too scared, weak and divided. They have no serious plan to tackle this problem.

And, in comments in the Telegraph, she said:

What they’ve announced today is just a big mess, I’m afraid.

The fact is, it’s not 11-year-old boys in school who are perpetrating violence against women and girls. This is happening because some people in Labour watched Adolescence and that’s what they want to focus on. It’s a complete distraction.

Badenoch was referring to Starmer praising the programme Adolescence earlier this year. The Tory leader was criticised after telling an interviewer that she had not watched the programme and did not see why she should, because it was fictional.

Alison McGovern, the local government minister, has confirmed that the government will let councils affected by local government reorganisation to postpone elections for another year.

At the start of this year the government announced that council elections planned for East Sussex, West Sussex, Essex, Thurrock, Hampshire, the Isle of Wight, Norfolk, Suffolk and Surrey would be delayed for 12 months, until 2026, because of the council reorganisation.

Two weeks ago it announced that four elections to new mayoral authorities, originally planned for next May, were also being delayed.

Today, in a statement to MPs, McGovern said an increasing number of councils were expressing concerns about “time and energy” that they would have to spend running elections to bodies that would not last for long anyway. Postponement would “free up resources to be concentrated on local government reorganisation and the delivery of good services”, she said.

McGovern said, as a result, the government has opened a consultation with councils on this issue. If councils want elections to go ahead, they will. But if councils ask for a delay, the government will be minded to allow it, she said.

The consultation will run until 15 January.

According to a statement from Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, there are 204 councils across 21 areas undergoing reorganisation and 63 of these councils are scheduled to hold elections in May 2026. They have all been given the option of postponement.

Sky News is reporting that this decision is likely to result in elections in Norfolk, Suffolk, Essex, and East and West Sussex being postponed for another year until 2027.

Even though these are county councils controlled by the Conservative party, James Cleverly, the shadow housing secretary, complained that this was a decision that would benefit the Labour party. He said:

Labour are scared of the voters. They thought they could completely overhaul local government and stack the deck in their favour. They were wrong. Earlier this month, Labour cancelled mayoral elections and now they are at it again with council elections, fiddling the democratic process to serve their own political interests.

Here is an extract from what Katie Lam, a shadow Home Office minister, said when she was responding to Jess Phillips’ Commons statement about the long-awaited VAWG plan. It is interesting because it shows the extent to which being anti-immigration has become an obsession for the party (which this year has been overtaken in popularity on the right by Reform UK). Lam, of course, is the MP who provoked controversy earlier this year for saying that legally settled families should be deported in part to ensure the UK is mostly “culturally coherent”.

Lam started by talking about measures taken by the previous Conservative government to improve the way rape cases are prosecuted, and welcomed measures in the Labour strategy that, she said, built on this work, such as the plan for specialist rape teams in police forces.

Then she swiftly moved on to the topic that took up most of her five-minute speech – the threat supposedly posed by migrants.

She said:

Truly protecting women and girls demands that we have difficult and sometimes awkward conversations, conversations about sex and consent, about private lives and criminality in the home, and about who is committing these crimes and why.

Relationships between men and women, relationships between parents and children are delicate, particular, and shaped by longstanding norms and beliefs.

Not every country and culture in the world believes, as we do, that women are equal to men with personal, bodily and sexual autonomy.

And when people from those countries and cultures come here, this can be dangerous.

Do not take my word for it. The defence counsel for Israr Niazal, an Afghan asylum seeker convicted of raping a 15-year-old girl, argued that Niazal did not understand the age of consent, or the concept of consent more broadly, because no such consent exists in Afghanistan.

If we cannot be honest about this, we will fail to achieve the first of this strategy’s goals – preventing men and boys from becoming abusers.

Lam went on to say that, despite repeated requests from the Tories, the government has yet to publish comprehensive data on crime committed by migrants. She said what data is available suggests “shocking variations in crime rates by nationality and immigration status”.

She went on:

According to data from the Ministry of Justice, foreign nationals make up a third of all convictions for sexual assaults against women, despite making up between 11 and 12% of the population.

Afghans and Eritreans, the nationalities which made up the largest number of boat crossings this year, are more than 20 times more likely to be convicted for sexual offences as British nationals.

Each and every case of sexual assault is wrong. Perpetrators must face the full force of the law, regardless of nationality, and it remains the case that statistically, the most dangerous place for women to be is in her own home.

But we must be able to have an informed and honest debate about whether mass migration is making this problem worse, particularly when a large number of recent migrants come here from countries where attitudes to women are very different from our own.

Lam ended by quoting a recent article published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, a BMJ academic journal, criticising the global campaign against female genital mutilation. She suggested this was an example of how immigration was leading to harmful ideas becoming acceptable in the UK.

Lam was right to say that the data relating to crime levels by immigration status is incomplete. But some of the figures she was quoting were misleading. Haroon Siddique and Michael Goodier explain why in this recent Guardian article.

The Migration Observatory also published a recent report on this topic. It concluded:

Overall, rates of incarceration and criminal convictions are broadly similar for foreign and British nationals. When controlling for age and sex, the share of non-citizens who are incarcerated is lower than among Brits. The available data is not yet sufficient to conduct the same analysis for convictions, although the Migration Observatory has requested the relevant data from MoJ.

Rachel de Souza, the children’s commission, has issued this statement about the VAWG plan. While she welcomes many elements of it, she says she is “deeply concerned” that it does not contain enough measures to protect girls under the age of 16. She says:

This strategy is an important step in our shared ambition to end violence against women and girls. I’m pleased to see many of my recommendations included, especially a new network of ‘Child Houses’ [see 10.01am], which are hugely valuable services bringing highly skilled professionals together under one roof to care for child victims of abuse and give them a voice.

I’m also delighted to see a move to ban nudification tools as I have pushed for, which strip people naked in images against their will. [See 1.37pm.] There is simply no reason for these tools to exist and I’m grateful to the government for responding decisively to this growing threat in children’s lives.

The focus on evidence-based relationships education that addresses the realities of teenagers’ lives today is welcome, as is the move to prioritise better training for teachers and experts to shape children’s views early on – but this must be done with sensitivity, without demonising young boys or pitting them against girls.

However, I remain deeply concerned that too much of this strategy will only protect girls who are 16 or over. We need robust data measures to see if the strategy is working, but this cannot be at the expense of listening and responding to the risks facing every girl from a young age.

In her opening statement to MPs, Phillips said that nudification tools are going to be banned. The Home Office has set out more detail on this in a news release.

More women and girls will be protected from deepfake abuse as new laws will ban ‘nudification’ tools that use generative AI to turn images of real people into fake nude pictures and videos without their permission.

As part of the government’s strategy to tackle violence against women and girls, ministers have pledged to make it impossible for children in the UK to take, share or view a nude image using their phones. The government will join forces with tech companies so we can work together to make this a reality and better protect young people from grooming, extortion, bullying, harassment and sexual abuse …

The government will work with tech companies to develop solutions to image based abuse, expanding on technology already being implemented by British safety tech company Safe To Net, and nudity detection filters already on smartphones …

The new legislation will allow the police to target the firms and individuals who design and supply these [nudification] tools.

Worryingly, these apps allow users to strip clothes, and produce intimate videos without the consent of those depicted – with devastating and long-lasting consequences to victims. Highly realistic, this technology has led to a scourge of financially motivated sexual extortion and even suicide in some cases. In Spain, the town of Almendralejo was devastated after several perpetrators used these apps to create nude images of twenty children walking to school.

Government has also already legislated to criminalise the creation of non-consensual sexual deepfakes, ensuring that offenders face the appropriate punishments for this atrocious harm.

The Home Office has now published the VAWG plan. It comes in two parts – the strategy, and the action plan.

In response to Lam (see 1.02pm), Phillips said that she agreed that data collection about these crimes has not been good enough.

She said the government was increasing the number of foreign offenders being deported.

But she suggested Lam was ignoring the main problem.

What I would also say to [Lam] is, if the only crime that I had to concern myself with halving was that was committed by people who arrive in our country, my job would be considerably easier because the vast majority of the data that I am talking about is around people who were born in our country abusing other people who were born in our country.

From every culture, from every creed, I have yet to come across any community where violence against women and girls does not happen.

Lam gave the official Tory response to the VAWG announcement when she replied in the Commons to Phillips’ statement. Lam devoted almost all of her time to talking about the alleged risk to migrants posed by migrants.

Katie Lam, a shadow Home Office minister, is responding on behalf of the Tories.

She says truly protecting women and girls will involve difficult conversations.

Not every culture in the world believes that women are equal to men, she says.

And when those cultures come to this country, that can cause a problem.

She quotes what was said in court by the defence when an Afghan sex offender was being tried. The court was told that the defendant did not understand the concept of consent.

She claims that the government has not published full data on crime as committed by people from different nationalities, and by immigration status. She says there are “shocking” variations by nationality.

She calls for a debate on whether mass migration is making the situation worse.

Jess Phillips, the safeguarding and VAWG minister, is making her statement to MPs.

She starts by saying the government is treating violence against women and girls as the national emergency that it is.

She says this strategy is different from previous ones because it will use the entire power of the state to tackle the problem.

It has three strands, she says: preventing violence in the first place; stopping re-offending; and supporting victims.

On prevention, she says the government is investing £20m to stop misogynistic views being embedded in the first place.

She says schools will be given more resources. And teachers will be taught to spot the warning signs.

The government wants to make the UK one of the places with the strongest laws protecting people online.

She says nudification tools will be banned.

Emma Reynolds, the environment secretary, has announced that she is setting up a farming and food partnership board. In a news release, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs says:

Chaired by Emma Reynolds, with farming minister Dame Angela Eagle as deputy, the board will bring together senior leaders from farming, food production, retail, finance and government to take a practical, partnership-led approach from farm to fork to strengthen our food production …

The board will focus on removing barriers to investment, improving how the supply chain works and unlocking growth opportunities across different parts of primary production and processing. It will have a clear emphasis on supporting agricultural productivity, homegrown British produce and strengthening food security.

Reynolds made the announcement as she published the review by Minette Batters, the former NFU president, into farming profitability. It includes 57 recommendations that the government will consider.

Downing Street has indicated that Britain is prepared to share the risks with European allies of using frozen Russian assets to aid Ukraine.

At the morning lobby briefing, the PM’s spokesperson was repeatedly asked if the government was willing to accept Belgium’s requests to share the risk of unlocking frozen Russian assets for use in Ukraine.

He indicated the Government would, telling reporters:

I think it’s evident within the government’s actions that what we want to see is those immobilised assets used to support Ukraine.

We believe that delivering these funds sends a very clear signal to Putin that he cannot outlast the support of the UK and our allies, that is what we remain focused on.

Severin Carrell is the Guardian’s Scotland editor.

Ash Regan, a former Scottish National party minister who defected to Alex Salmond’s nationalist party Alba, faces a two-day suspension from the Scottish parliament for breaching its code of conduct in a row over gender recognition.

Holyrood’s standards committee has recommended Regan, who now sits as an independent after quitting Alba some months after losing a leadership contest, be suspended on a Wednesday and Thursday – its busiest two days. That needs to be approved by a full vote in parliament, after the Christmas recess.

It ruled she had breached the MSP’s code by posting a claim on the social media site X which attacked the Scottish Green MSP Maggie Chapman, over remarks Chapman made about the UK supreme court ruling on the definition of woman.

Chapman has been one of Holyrood’s most vociferous supporters of trans rights; Regan is one of its most vociferous gender critical activists.

Regan said on X: “I’ve formally reported Maggie Chapman MSP to the presiding officer and standards committee following her dangerous dismissal of the supreme court’s ruling on the Equality Act as a ‘political attack’. MSPs have a duty to uphold the law, not undermine it.”

After considering a report from Holyrood’s ethics commissioner, the committee unanimously agreed this was a breach of part 9.1 of the code of conduct, which bars MSPs from disclosing, communicating or discussing complaints about other MSPs before a report on that complaint has been published.

In interviews last week, Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, played down the prospect of the UK following Australia and banning under-16s from having their own social media accounts. She did not rule out the idea, but she said she did not believe it would be easy to enforce.

But, in her interviews this morning, Jess Phillips, the minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls (VAWG) sounded much more positive about the Australian experience, saying the government would consider it “very closely”. She told Times Radio:

What I would say is that you cannot have a violence against women and girls policy that doesn’t look at the online environment, or certainly one that looks at misogyny and the behaviours of boys who grow into men without looking at an online world …

The government will be looking very, very closely at what is happening in Australia, and we would always take the best of what is available around the world with regard to the safety and security of children.

But Phillips also said the UK had been a “trailblazer” for online safety.

Today, when the full policies are announced in the violence against women and girls strategy, you will see that online harm, online harms to children, are very, very much part of that.

The employment rights bill has received royal assent, which means it is now the Employment Rights Act and it is law, Lindsay Hoyle, the Speaker, told the Commons this morning. Labour MPs cheered when they heard the news.

Richard Adams is the Guardian’s education editor.

The British public supports the government’s decision to rejoin the Erasmus youth education and work experience programme, according to snap polling released by YouGov.

The pollsters asked 7,300 adults about one element of the scheme – UK students spending “a year at European universities as part of their UK degrees courses without paying extra fees, and vice versa for European students” – and found that 65% would support it and only 12% were opposed, while 22% answered “don’t know”.

The good news for the government is that younger people aged 18 to 24 – those most likely to take part – were even more enthusiastic.

However the question didn’t note the £570m cost to the UK for one years’ membership, which shadow education secretary Laura Trott described as “nuts”. It also didn’t mention that the Erasmus+ programme includes far more than university students: before the UK left in 2020 schools were its most active participants.

The question’s mention of studying “without paying extra fees” suggests that the higher education element will operate as it did prior to 2020, although that remains to be set out, according to university leaders.

The crown court backlog in England and Wales has risen to nearly 80,000 cases in a new record high, PA Media reports. PA says:

Data published this morning showed the open caseload was 79,619 at the end of September, up 2% from 78,096 at the end of June.

It is also up 9% from the same point a year earlier, according to Ministry of Justice figures.

The number of cases open for a year or more passed 20,000 for the first time at 20,155 at the end of September, which is up 25% year on year and up 6% from the end of June.

Open caseload refers to the number of outstanding cases.

Ministry of Justice projections published earlier this month suggested the crown court backlog could reach a high estimate of 125,000 by the end of this parliament under current conditions. David Lammy, the deputy PM and justice secretary, says his plans to limit jury trials will help to reduce this.

Commenting on the figures today, Lammy said:

This Government inherited a system on the brink of collapse.

Victims’ lives are being put on hold as cases are kicked several years into the future.

The scale of this crisis means tinkering at the edges is not enough. We simply cannot spend our way out of this mess – only fundamental reform can give the brave survivors of crime fairer and faster justice.

Kemi Badenoch has vowed to scrap green spending to pay for a multibillion-pound fund to rearm the UK, PA Media report. PA says:

Accusing Labour of failing to invest in the UK’s armed forces, the Conservative leader has proposed reallocating £17bn to “accelerate” Britain’s “war readiness”.

She said: “We must ensure our armed forces are equipped and ready to defend our country, because defence of the realm must be the first priority of any government.”

The money includes £11bn from the national wealth fund that is currently allocated to net zero projects, with the fund itself turned into a new national defence and resilience bank.

Another £6bn over three years would be taken from the government’s research and development budget and given to the Ministry of Defence to invest in new technology.

Alongside investment from the private sector, the Tories said they expected their plan to mobilise £50bn for defence.

Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said the money would “deliver the drone revolution our armed forces require” and create a “more lethal” military.

As well as investing in UK defence firms, the money is expected to be used to build more resilient supply chains, reducing Britain’s reliance on “hostile states” such as China.

Labour has previously pledged to raise defence spending to 2.5% of GDP from 2027 and to 3% by the end of the decade.

The Tories claim that, together, these measures would fund a £50b “sovereign defence fund”. In a briefing, this is how they explain it.

-£6bn (£2bn per annum over the course of this parliament) would be reallocated from the Research and Development (R&D) budget in the Department of Science, Innovation and Technology to the MOD. It is well known that defence technology and innovation can have spillover effects into other sectors, like communications and transport, causing a multiplier effect.

-£11bn ringfenced from the national wealth fund (NWF) – which will become the national defence and resilience bank (NDRB). This funding is currently allocated to many of Ed Miliband’s costly eco-projects. We would leave the remainder of financing in the fund for national resilience like water and transport.

-Approximately £33bnn of private finance via NDRB mobilisation. The existing NWF target of mobilising £3 of private investment for every £1 of public investment would remain for the SDF – so this could unlock tens of billions of pounds in private investment.

In response, a Labour party spokesperson said:

The Tories are gaslighting the British public on defence.

These are yet more fantasy figures from a Conservative party that cut defence by £12bn in their first five years in power. Look at their record: their time in office starved our forces of funding, drove down morale and left Britain less safe. They did it before, and they’d do it again.

Almost 40 Labour MPs have signed an open letter to Keir Starmer describing the government’s plans to limit access to jury trials as madness.

In the letter, organised by Karl Turner, who is normally a loyalist, the MPs say:

The drastic restriction of the right to trial by jury is not a silver bullet. To limit a fundamental right for what will make a marginal difference to the backlog, if any, is madness and will cause more problems than it solves.

The government has a working majority of 167 and so, even if all 39 MPs who have signed the letter were to vote against the government when it legislates for its plans next year, they would not be enough to see it defeated.

But there are other Labour MPs who share the concerns of this group, and the government is already under strong pressure to a sunset clause on the plans – meaning the jury trial restrictions were time-limited for just a few years – as a compromise.

Ben Quinn has more on the story here.

Schools have warned of growing misogyny from pupils towards teachers and a lack of avenues to seek help about concerns over sexually aggressive behaviour, Jess Phillips, the VAWG minister, has said. Jessica Elgot has the story.

Here are some more extracts from the statement about the VAWG strategy issued by Claire Waxman, the incoming victims’ commissioner for England and Wales. Here comments about funding were quoted at 9.25am. But other points are worth noting.

• Waxman says that, while elements of the plan are welcome, it remains to be seen if, overall, it will provide what is needed.

While many individual initiatives are welcome, it remains to be seen whether the overall Strategy provides the scale, pace, and leadership required to match the government’s ambition - and truly tackle this emergency.

• She specifically welcomes the plan to roll out nationally the Child House model for supporting child abuse victims.

In terms of specific measures, the national rollout of the Child House model - pioneered by Lighthouse in London - is a welcome step I have long called for. It marks vital progress towards delivering on the recommendations of the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse.

There is more about the Child House model here, and more on the Lighthouse here.

• She also welcomes the expansion of Operation Soteria, a police/CPS partnership to improve the prosecution of rape and serious sexual offences.

I also welcome initiatives such as the expansion of Operation Soteria to reduce the re-traumatisation too many victims experience in the trial process. Long after my 2019 rape review, ‘end-to-end’ reform of the justice system for serious sexual offences is finally in sight - but only if the government now delivers on its commitment to independent legal advice for rape survivors, and tackles the long waits for justice.

• She says plans in the sentencing bill to limit the number of offenders being jailed will undermine the VAWG strategy.

Without clear, sustainable investment and cross-government leadership, I am concerned we run the risk of the Strategy amounting to less than the sum of its parts; a wish-list of tactical measures rather than a bold, unifying strategic framework.

The Sentencing Bill underlines this lack of cohesion. Victims need confidence that the system will protect them, yet under the proposals in the bill, the reality is that many abusers will avoid prison entirely or benefit from early release - undermining the very safety this Strategy seeks to guarantee.

Jessica Elgot is the Guardian’s deputy political editor.

Keir Starmer is planning for a new king’s speech after the crunch May elections as a reset moment for the government amid speculation over the prime minister’s future.

Senior sources in parliament said planning was under way to end the parliamentary session the week after local elections in England, making it a significantly longer session than normal, and nearly two years since Labour first set out its legislative agenda.

Labour is facing a potentially devastating set of results in England, Wales and Scotland, with the possible loss of hundreds of council seats to Reform and the Greens in England as well as defeat for the first time in Wales, where Plaid Cymru and Reform are leading in the polls.

In Scotland, the Scottish National party are polling on course to maintain power despite pre-election hopes that Labour’s Anas Sarwar could become first minister. Critics of Starmer’s leadership have repeatedly named May as the moment when would-be leadership challengers could call for him to stand aside.

The last king’s speech was in July 2024, weeks after Labour won the general election, but a combination of parliamentary rebellions, international and economic turmoil and defeats in the House of Lords has meant the government needs more time to complete the legislation.

The relatively late end to the session will raise some hopes among supporters of assisted dying that it may be possible to complete the bill, which will fall if it does not pass by the end of the session. They expect many opponents will try to use procedure to talk out the private members’ bill and bar it from progressing.

Further changes to the House of Lords are among a number of measures expected in the king’s speech, including introducing a mandatory retirement age of 80.

Good morning. The government is finally publishing its violence against women and girls (VAWG) strategy. In its manifesto Labour said it wanted to halve VAWG within a decade, and so this is a vital policy area. Publication of the strategy has been delayed three times. In the Commons on Monday, in response to an urgent question on this, Jess Phillips, minister for safeguarding and VAWG, said the delays were down to her. “It is entirely my fault because, with every iteration, the strategy was not ambitious enough. I could have done it more quickly, and then it would not have been as good,” she said.

Although the document is being published today, the VAWG strategy is being promoted via a budget-style, week-long media strategy. We have already had announcements form the Home Office covering extra spending for abuse victims, specialist NHS help for abuse victims, and all police forces introducing specialist rape and sexual offence teams.

And, overnight, the government has been briefing on plans to tackle misogynist behaviour in schools. Alexandra Topping and Rajeev Syal have the details here.

Phillips has been giving interviews this morning and she has described these measures as particularly important because, while other aspects of the strategy deal with the consequences of VAWG, this aspect deals with prevention. She told Times Radio:

I’m a bit sick, I have to say, as somebody who’s campaigned on this for many years, of just trying to put nicer plasters onto ever growing scars, and so we’ve got to – the government is really, really focused on the prevention.

But how good is the strategy overall? Claire Waxman, the incoming victims’ commissioner for England and Wales, has issued a statement saying that, while the plan contains many welcome measures, potential lack of funding is “deeply concerning”. She says she is worried it could end up as “less than the sum of its parts”.

She says:

Ultimately, the success of this strategy hinges on whether delivery partners are equipped to succeed. Early indications around funding are deeply concerning. The strategy introduces welcome measures in schools and the NHS which will, by design, drive up disclosures and referrals to police and victim services. Yet frontline services are already overstretched and struggling to meet need, and the criminal justice system remains in crisis.

Funding is critical. Driving up demand without increasing capacity puts victims at risk and threatens to destabilise the very partners the strategy relies upon. This concern is heightened by the lack of meaningful consultation. Victim services are not an optional extra to this strategy - they must be the backbone of it.

Without clear, sustainable investment and cross-government leadership, I am concerned we run the risk of the strategy amounting to less than the sum of its parts; a wish-list of tactical measures rather than a bold, unifying strategic framework.

Here is the agenda for the day.

9.30am: The Ministry of Justice publishes its latest figures on the courts backlog.

9.30am: Emma Reynolds, the environment secretary, takes questions in the Commons.

11am: Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader, and John McDonnell, the Labour MP, speak at a press conference held by relatives and supporters of the Palestine Action-lined hunger strikers.

After 11.30am: Jess Phillips, the VAWG minister, makes a statement to MPs about the government’s plan to tackle violence against women and girls.

Morning: Kemi Badenoch is on a visit in east Hampshire.

Noon: The Bank of England announces its decision on interest rates.

The government is also making announcements via 13 written ministerial statements, covering police funding, the cost of the government’s response to the Covid inquiry, the Minette Batters review of farm profitability, and the inquiry into conditions at the Manston asylum centre.

If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.

If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.

I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.

Share