Tanya Gold 

Nothing like the dame

Since Tuesday, a larger, flatter, beiger Judi Dench has hung in Room 40 at the National Portrait Gallery.
  
  

Judi Dench with Alessandro Raho's portrait of her
Dame Judi Dench with her portrait by Alessandro Raho. Photo: Russell Boyce/Reuters Photograph: Russell Boyce/Reuters

Since Tuesday, a larger, flatter, beiger Judi Dench has hung in Room 40 at the National Portrait Gallery. Hurled on to canvas by Alessandro Raho, she joins an agonised Harold Pinter (red, with books), a strangulated Jonathan Miller (brown, chin resting on fist) and Gilbert and George, who are yellow, grinning and naked. Dead Hamlets and Lears and Tragic Muses gesticulate; a sculptress is wearing no pants just around the corner. But Judi upstages them all.

She stands 2521mm x 1759mm and stares. She is at least the size of the Incredible Hulk, Steven Segal or Patrick Swayze. She wears a white T-shirt (perhaps Gap), beige trousers (George at Asda, I think) and a cream coat. Grey suede pumps with giant soles (most likely Russell & Bromley) conceal her Oscar-winning feet. Her expression is psychopathically neutral, like Kevin Spacey's. Her ordinariness is marvellous. Her latest, longest role is clear; she is a poster girl for militant normality and the patron saint of Waitrose. The dismal beatification is complete.

Why does Judi pose thus? Why did she do it? It feels like a national treasure has bitten us. She was Cleopatra, Viola and Lady Macbeth ("Out, damned spot, out, I say, from my wool/polyester mix jacket!"); shouldn't she be a goddess, an empress or a fiend? She could even have smiled, just a little. Instead she chose to play Jean from As Time Goes By, again and for ever. As I watched her, I imagined her eating mushrooms and doing something wet with Geoffrey Palmer.

Raho says he conceived the portrait waiting for Judi. He wanted "to trap something I saw in her while she waited in the foyer, unaware of me. I cast her as a wealthy housewife who shops at Jaeger." But Judi didn't have to agree to this dishonour; she could have drowned herself, attacked herself with a snake or cast herself off the Lyric theatre's battlements. Instead, she says she was "thrilled and very flattered".

Was Judi leaned on? Bankers JP Morgan paid for the portrait; perhaps they demanded she impersonate their customers. Perhaps Judi wanted to hurt Joan Collins, whose lips are vermilion for ever in the NPG, or to silently rebuke the costume-drama genre and its obsession with horses and wigs. Perhaps she was afraid to try to out-pout Helen Mirren, suspended nearby. Is it "Blairite"? Satire? A devious type of vanity? A Clarks advert? The enigma is locked.

 

Leave a Comment

Required fields are marked *

*

*